Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to adapt the short form of the 12-item Highly Sensitive Child (HSC) scale into Turkish and examine its factor structure, validity, and reliability in school-age children and adolescents.
Materials and Methods: A total of 139 children and adolescents aged 8-18 years were reached. A total of 126 participants completed the HSC scale. In line with the original version, one-factor, three-factor, and bifactor models were tested for the Turkish sample. “Negative emotionality”, “effortful control”, “perceptual sensitivity”, “behavioral inhibition”, “behavioral activation system”, “negative affect”, and “positive affect” scales were used to test validity.
Results: Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the one-factor structure was incompatible with the data, whereas the bifactor model was rejected. The three-factor model was considered the most compatible with the data. The reliability values of the scale were found to be acceptable, except for the aesthetic sensitivity (AES) subscale. Cronbach’s alpha values were 0.68 for the 5-item “ease of excitation” subscale, 0.43 for the 4-item AES subscale, 0.63 for the 3-item “low sensory threshold” subscale, and 0.64 for the 12-item HSC scale. The correlations of HSC and its subscales with similar temperament traits were in the expected directions pointing to the convergent validity of the scale. A significant percentage of variances in HSC and its subscales were not explained by the similar scales examined, indicating the discriminant validity of the scale.
Conclusion: This study found that the Turkish adaptation of the HSC scale was psychometrically adequate.
Keywords: Environmental sensitivity, sensory processing sensitivity, highly sensitive child scale, temperament
References
Belsky J, Pluess M. Beyond diathesis stress: differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Psychol Bull. 2009;135:885-908.
Ellis BJ, Boyce WT, Belsky J, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, van Ijzendoorn MH. Differential susceptibility to the environment: an evolutionary--neurodevelopmental theory. Dev Psychopathol. 2011;23:7-28.
Pluess M. Individual Differences in Environmental Sensitivity. Child Dev Perspect. 2015;9:138-143.
Aron EN, Aron A, Jagiellowicz J. Sensory processing sensitivity: a review in the light of the evolution of biological responsivity. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2012;16:262-282.
Gunnar MR, Wenner JA, Thomas KM, Glatt CE, McKenna MC, Clark AG. The brain-derived neurotrophic factor Val66Met polymorphism moderates early deprivation effects on attention problems. Dev Psychopathol. 2012;24:1215-1223.
Hassan R, Mills AS, Day KL, Van Lieshout RJ, Schmidt LA. Relations among Temperament, Familial Socioeconomic Status, and Inhibitory Control in Typically Developing Four-Year-Old Children. J Child Fam Stud. 2019;28:950-958.
Belsky J, van Ijzendoorn MH. What works for whom? Genetic moderation of intervention efficacy. Dev Psychopathol. 2015;27:1-6.
May AK, Smeeth D, McEwen F, Karam E, Rieder MJ, Elzagallaai AA, van Uum S, Lionetti F, Pluess M. The role of environmental sensitivity in the mental health of Syrian refugee children: a multi-level analysis. Mol Psychiatry. 2024;29:3170-3179.
Nocentini A, Menesini E, Pluess M. The Personality Trait of Environmental Sensitivity Predicts Children’s Positive Response to School-Based Antibullying Intervention. Clin Psychol Sci. 2018;6:848-859.
Ellis BJ, Boyce WT, Belsky J, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, van Ijzendoorn MH. Differential susceptibility to the environment: an evolutionary--neurodevelopmental theory. Dev Psychopathol. 2011;23:7-28.
Monroe SM, Simons AD. Diathesis-stress theories in the context of life stress research: implications for the depressive disorders. Psychol Bull. 1991;110:406-425.
Belsky J, Pluess M. Beyond risk, resilience, and dysregulation: phenotypic plasticity and human development. Dev Psychopathol. 2013;25:1243-1261.
Pluess M, Belsky J. Differential susceptibility to parenting and quality child care. Dev Psychol. 2010;46:379-390.
Belsky J, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, van IJzendoorn MH. For Better and For Worse Differential Susceptibility to Environmental Influences. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2007;16:300-304.
Davies PT, Hentges RF, Coe JL, Parry LQ, Sturge-Apple ML. Children’s dove temperament as a differential susceptibility factor in child rearing contexts. Dev Psychol. 2021;57:1274-1290.
Buist KL, Slagt M, de Haan AD. Sibling relationships and school entry psychosocial functioning: Dual risk or differential susceptibility? J Fam Psychol. 2022;36:597-607.
Raver CC, Blair C, Willoughby M. Poverty as a predictor of 4-year-olds’ executive function: new perspectives on models of differential susceptibility. Dev Psychol. 2013;49:292-304.
Hughes K, Coplan RJ. Why classroom climate matters for children high in anxious solitude: A study of differential susceptibility. Sch Psychol Q. 2018;33:94-102.
Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, van Ijzendoorn MH. Differential susceptibility to rearing environment depending on dopamine-related genes: new evidence and a meta-analysis. Dev Psychopathol. 2011;23:39-52.
Slagt M, Dubas JS, Deković M, van Aken MA. Differences in sensitivity to parenting depending on child temperament: A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2016;142:1068-1110.
Aron EN, Aron A. Sensory-processing sensitivity and its relation to introversion and emotionality. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997;73:345-368.
Aron EN, Aron A, Jagiellowicz J. Sensory processing sensitivity: a review in the light of the evolution of biological responsivity. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2012;16:262-282.
Boterberg S, Warreyn P. Making sense of it all: The impact of sensory processing sensitivity on daily functioning of children. Pers Individ Dif. 2016;92:80-86.
Şengül-İnal G, Sümer N. Exploring the Multidimensional Structure of Sensory Processing Sensitivity in Turkish Samples. Curr Psychol. 2020;39:194-206.
Acevedo BP, Aron EN, Aron A, Sangster MD, Collins N, Brown LL. The highly sensitive brain: an fMRI study of sensory processing sensitivity and response to others’ emotions. Brain Behav. 2014;4:580-594.
Şengül-İnal G, Sümer N. Duyusal İşlemleme Hassasiyeti: Kuramsal Çerçeve ve Derleme Çalışması. Türk Psikol Yazıları. 2018;21:38-54.
Aron EN. The Highly Sensitive Child: Helping Our Children Thrive When the World Overwhelms Them. Broadway Book - Thorsons. 2002.
Pluess M, Assary E, Lionetti F, Lester KJ, Krapohl E, Aron EN, Aron A. Environmental sensitivity in children: Development of the Highly Sensitive Child Scale and identification of sensitivity groups. Dev Psychol. 2018;54:51-70.
Walda SAE. Hoogsensitiviteit bij kinderen in het basisonderwijs [High sensitivity in children from regular education]. 2007. Radboud Universiteit.
Smolewska KA, McCabe SB, Woody EZ. A psychometric evaluation of the Highly Sensitive Person Scale: The components of sensory-processing sensitivity and their relation to the BIS/BAS and “Big Five.” Pers Individ Dif. 2006;40:1269-1279.
Lionetti F, Aron A, Aron EN, Burns GL, Jagiellowicz J, Pluess M. Dandelions, tulips and orchids: evidence for the existence of low-sensitive, medium-sensitive and high-sensitive individuals. Transl Psychiatry. 2018;8:24.
Weyn S, Leeuwen K Van, Pluess M, Lionetti F, Greven C, Goossens L, Colpin H, Noortgate WV, Verschueren K, Bastin M, Hoof EV, Fruyt FD, Bijttebier P. Psychometric properties of the Highly Sensitive Child scale across developmental stage , gender , and country. Curr Psychol. 2019;40:3309-3325.
Weyn S, Van Leeuwen K, Pluess M, Lionetti F, Goossens L, Bosmans G, Van Den Noortgate W, Debeer D, Bröhl AS, Bijttebier P. Improving the Measurement of Environmental Sensitivity in Children and Adolescents: The Highly Sensitive Child Scale-21 Item Version. Assessment. 2022;29:607-629.
Slagt M, Dubas JS, van Aken MAG, Ellis BJ, Deković M. Sensory processing sensitivity as a marker of differential susceptibility to parenting. Dev Psychol. 2018;54:543-558.
Carver CS, White TL. Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994;67:319-333.
Şişman S. Davranışsal İnhibisyon Sistemi / Davranışsal Aktivasyon Sistemi Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Psikol Çalışmaları. 2012;2:1-22.
Capaldi DM, Rothbart MK. Development and validation of an early adolescent temperament measure. J Early Adolesc. 1992;12:153-173.
Ellis LK, Rothbart MK. Revision of the Early Adolescent Temperament Questionnaire. Poster presented at the 2001 biennial meeting of the society for research in child development, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 2001.
Bayram H. Ergen bireylerin kardeş çatışmalarını çözme stratejilerini neler belirler? ebeveynler, kardeşler, veya mizaç (yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans Tezi). 2014, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara
Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;54:1063-1070.
Peker A. Analyzing the risk factors predicting the cyberbullying status of secondary school students. Egit ve Bilim. 2015;40:57-75.
Gençöz T. Pozitif ve Negatif Duygu Ölçeği: Geçerllik ve Güvenilirlik Çalışması. Türk Psikol Derg. 2000;15:19-26.
Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. 6th ed. Boston: MA: Pearson. 2013.
Sümer N. Yapısal eşitlik modelleri: Temel kavramlar ve örnek uygulamalar. Türk Psikol Yazıları. 2000;3:49-70.
Marsh HW, Hocevar D. A new, more powerful approach to multitrait-multimethod analyses: Application of second-order confirmatory factor analysis. J Appl Psychol. 1988;73:107-117.
Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Müller H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of fit measures. Methods Psychol Res Online. 2003;8:23-74.
Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model A Multidiscip J. 1999;6:1-55.
Kaplan D. Structural Equation Modeling: Foundation and Extensions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.; 2000.
Streiner DL. Starting at the Beginning: An Introduction to Coefficient Alpha and Internal Consistency. J Pers Assess. 2003;80:99-103.
Scrimin S, Osler G, Pozzoli T, Moscardino U. Early adversities, family support, and child well-being: The moderating role of environmental sensitivity. Child Care Health Dev. 2018;44:885-891.
Lionetti F, Aron EN, Aron A, Klein DN, Pluess M. Observer-rated environmental sensitivity moderates children’s response to parenting quality in early childhood. Dev Psychol. 2019;55:2389-2402.
