An Investigation of the Clinical Characteristics of Children and Adolescents in Institutional Care Applying to a Child Psychiatry Clinic
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Article
P: 154-161
July 2023

An Investigation of the Clinical Characteristics of Children and Adolescents in Institutional Care Applying to a Child Psychiatry Clinic

Turk J Child Adolesc Ment Health 2023;30(2):154-161
1. Muğla Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Çocuk ve Ergen Ruh Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları Kliniği, Muğla, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 14.11.2021
Accepted Date: 19.03.2022
Publish Date: 01.08.2023
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Objectives:

In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of children and adolescents who applied to the child psychiatry outpatient clinic and were in institutional care.

Materials and Methods:

Our study included 54 children and adolescents in institutional care, who applied to the Zonguldak Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital Child Psychiatry Outpatient Clinic between 01.06.2019 and 01.01.2021. The polyclinic files and social examination reports of the cases were reviewed retrospectively.

Results:

It was determined that the most common reasons for being admitted to institutional care were basic care deficiencies/neglect, parental separation/death and sexual abuse. Sexual abuse was found to be significantly more common in girls. 88.9% of the children have psychiatric symptoms at a threshold for diagnosis, and the most common mental disorders were attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder, major depressive disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, specific learning disability, intellectual disability.

Conclusion:

It is thought that children in institutional care are in the risk group in terms of psychiatric disorders and preventive measures are important. Considering that children are often admitted to institutional care for reasons such as basic care deficiencies/neglect, absence of parents, and that being admitted to the institution at an early age may be associated with mental disorder it can be said that increasing family oriented services and counseling services aimed at supporting families economically and socially may be protective for the child’s mental health.

References

1
Zeanah CH, Keyes A, Settles L. Attachment relationship experiences and childhood psychopathology. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003;1008:22-30.
2
Erol N, Şimşek Z. Korunma gereksinimi olan çocuklar: Kurum bakımı ve koruyucu aile sistemi. Aysev AS, Taner YI, eds. Çocuk ve Ergen Ruh Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları. İstanbul. Golden Print. 2007:963-985.
3
T.C. Aile, Çalışma ve Sosyal Hizmetler Bakanlığı, Çocuk Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü. https://www.aile.gov.tr/raporlar/yillik-faaliyet-raporlari
4
Zeanah CH, Egger HL, Smyke AT, Nelson CA, Fox NA, Marshall PJ, Guthrie D. Institutional rearing and psychiatric disorders in Romanian preschool children. Am J Psychiatry. 2009;166:777-785.
5
Milot T, Ethier LS, St-Laurent D, Provost MA. The role of trauma symptoms in the development of behavioral problems in maltreated preschoolers. Child Abuse Negl. 2010;34:225-234.
6
Schmid M, Goldbeck L, Nuetzel J, Fegert JM. Prevalence of mental disorders among adolescents in German youth welfare institutions. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2008;2:2.
7
Simşek Z, Erol N, Oztop D, Ozer Ozcan O. Kurum bakimindaki çocuk ve ergenlerde davraniş ve duygusal sorunlarin epidemiyolojisi; ulusal örneklemde karşilaştirmali bir araştirma [Epidemiology of emotional and behavioral problems in children and adolescents reared in orphanages: a national comparative study]. Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2008;19:235-246.
8
Rutter M, Kumsta R, Schlotz W, Sonuga-Barke E. Longitudinal studies using a “natural experiment” design: the case of adoptees from Romanian institutions. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012;51:762-770.
9
Humphreys KL, Gleason MM, Drury SS, Miron D, Nelson CA 3rd, Fox NA, Zeanah CH. Effects of institutional rearing and foster care on psychopathology at age 12 years in Romania: follow-up of an open, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry. 2015;2:625-634.
10
Johnson DE. Medical and developmental sequelae of early childhood institutional-ization in Eastern European adoptees. In: Nelson CA, ed. The effects of early adversity on neurobehavioraldevelopment. 1st ed. Mahwaw. NJ; Psychology Press. 2000;113-162.
11
Ayaz M, Ayaz AB, Basgül ŞS, Karakaya I, Şişmanlar Ş, Yar A, Şentürk E, Dikmen S. 3-5 yaş grubu kurum bakımındaki çocuklarda ruhsal hastalık sıklığı ve ilişkili etmenler. Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2012;23:82-88.
12
Beckett C, Bredenkamp D, Castle J, Groothues C, O’Connor TG, Rutter M; English and Romanian Adoptees (ERA) Study Team. Behavior patterns associated with institutional deprivation: a study of children adopted from Romania. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2002;23:297-303.
13
Lee RM, Seol KO, Sung M, Miller MJ; Minnesota International Adoption Project Team. The behavioral development of Korean children in institutional care and international adoptive families. Dev Psychol. 2010;46:468-478.
14
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th ed. (DSM-5). Washington DC; ABD; American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.
15
T.C. Aile, Çalışma ve Sosyal Hizmetler Bakanlığı, Sosyal Hizmetler Ve Çocuk Esirgeme Kurumu Genel Müdürlüğü. Korunmakta olan çocuklar hakknda düzenlenen raporlar formlar ve diğer belgeler. https://www.aile.gov.tr/chgm/mevzuat/genelge
16
Erol N, Simsek Z, Münir K. Mental health of adolescents reared in institutional care in Turkey: challenges and hope in the twenty-first century. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010;19:113-124.
17
Yektaş Ç, Tufan AE, Yazıcı M. Düzce ili çocuk evlerinde kalan çocuk ve ergenlerin klinik ve sosyodemografik özellikleri. Konuralp Tıp Dergisi. 2018;10:298-304.
18
Bhatt AA, Rahman S, Bhatt NM. Mental health issues in institutionalized adolescent orphans. Int J Indian Psychol. 2015;3:57–77.
19
Putnam FW. Ten-year research update review: child sexual abuse. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2003;42:269-278.
20
Berger LM. Income, family characteristics, and physical violence toward children. Child Abuse Negl. 2005;29:107-133.
21
Fis NP, Arman A, Kalaça S, Berkem M. Psychiatric evaluation of sexual abuse cases: a clinical representative sample from Turkey. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2010;32:1285-1290.
22
Uytun M, Öztop DB. Cinsel istismar mağduru çocuk ve ergenlere konulan psikiyatrik tanıların ve uygulanan tedavilerin devamlılığının değerlendirilmesi. Yeni Symposium Dergisi. 2016;54:18-24.
23
Tuncer B, Erdoğan T. Korunmaya muhtaç çocuklar ve korunmaya muhtaç çocuklara sağlanan bakım yöntemleri. IBAD. 2018;3:515-527.
24
Yolcuoğlu İG. Çocukların ihmal-istismara uğramasında aile ve çocuklara yönelik risk faktörleri ve sosyal hizmet müdahalesi. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet. 2010;21:73-83.
25
Fraser MW, Jenson JM. Social Policy for Children and Families: A Risk And Resilience Perspective. 3rd ed. In: Fraser MW, Jenson JM, eds. California: Sage Publications. 2016.
26
Nemeroff CB. Paradise Lost: The Neurobiological and Clinical Consequences of Child Abuse and Neglect. Neuron. 2016;89:892-909.
27
Yulaf Y, Gümüştaş F. Kurum bakımında yaşayan ve evlat edinilen çocuk ve ergenlerin ruhsal bozukluklar açısından karşılaştırılması. Çukurova Med J. 2019;44:904-910.
28
Barone L, Dellagiulia A, Lionetti F. When the primary caregiver ismissing: Investigating proximal and distal variables involved ininstitutionalized children’s adjustment. Child Abuse Review. 2015;25:454–468.
29
McLaughlin KA, Sheridan MA, Winter W, Fox NA, Zeanah CH, Nelson CA. Widespread reductions in cortical thickness following severe early-life deprivation: a neurodevelopmental pathway to attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2014;76:629-638.
30
Yolcuoğlu İG. Türkiye’de çocuk koruma sisteminin genel olarak değerlendirilmesi. Aile ve Toplum. 2009;5:43-58.