Parent Form of the Childhood Sexual Abuse Myths Scale: Validity and Reliability Study
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Article
P: 31-37
March 2021

Parent Form of the Childhood Sexual Abuse Myths Scale: Validity and Reliability Study

Turk J Child Adolesc Ment Health 2021;28(1):31-37
1. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Bölümü, Rehberlik ve Psikolojik Danışma Anabilim Dalı, Ankara, Türkiye
2. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Bölümü, Rehberlik ve Psikolojik Danışma Anabilim Dalı, Adıyaman, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 02.07.2020
Accepted Date: 21.08.2020
Publish Date: 26.02.2021
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Objectives:

Parents have an important role in preventing childhood sexual abuse or intervening effectively it. In this context, parents are expected to first become aware of myths about sexual abuse and then increase the level of consciousness by gaining correct information instead of these myths. From this point of view, this study is aim to make validity and reliability studies of parent of the Childhood Sexual Abuse Myths Scale (CSAMS) developed on university students.

Materials and Methods:

Within the scope of this study, data were collected from 419 parents, 333 of whom were mothers (79.5%) and 86 were fathers (20.5%). The analysis of the data was carried out with SPSS and AMOS. Within the scope of the validity study of the scale, the construct validity and confirmatory factor analysis were examined.

Results:

As a result of the analysis, it was found that the fit indices of the two-dimensional structure of the parent form of the scale were significant and acceptable. Within the scope of the reliability study of the scale, the internal consistency coefficient was examined and it was observed that it had a high level of reliability.

Conclusion:

It is possible to say that Parent Form of The CSAMS has psychometric characteristics necessary for using this in the studies to be carried out in Turkey.

References

1
Geçtan E. İnsan Olmak (26. baskı). İstanbul: Metis Yayınları; 2003.
2
Bornstein MH. Parenting: Science and Practice, Journal of Parenting. 2001;1:1-4.
3
Baumrind D. Effects of Authoritative Parental Control on Child Behavior, Child Dev. 1966;37:887-907.
4
Elrod JM, Rubin, R. H. Parental Involvement in Sexual Abuse Prevention Education, Child Abuse Negl. 1993;17:527-538.
5
Tang CS, Yan EC. Intention to participate in child sexual abuse prevention programs: a study of Chinese adults in Hong Kong. Child Abuse Negl. 2004;28:1187-1197.
6
Boakye KE. Culture and Nondisclosure of Child Sexual Abuse in Ghana: A Theoretical and Empirical Exploration, Law Soc Inq. 2009;34:951-979.
7
Cromer LD, Goldsmith RE. Child sexual abuse myths: attitudes, beliefs, and individual differences. J Child Sex Abus. 2010;19:618-647. 
8
Koçtürk N, Kızıldağ S. Çocukluk Dönemi Cinsel İstismarına İlişkin Mitler Ölçeği’nin Geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması, Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2018;30:778-808. 
9
Walsh K, Brandon L. Their Children’s First Educators: Parents’ Views about Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Education, J Child Fam Stud. 2012;21:734-746.
10
Mendelson T, Letourneau J. Parent-Focused Prevention of Child Sexual Abuse, Prev Sci. 2015;16:844-852.
11
Wurtele SK, Kenny MC. Partnering with Parents to Prevent Childhood Sexual Abuse. Child Abuse Review: Journal of the British Association for the Study and Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect, 2010;19:130-152.
12
Wurtele SK, Moreno T, Kenny MC. Evaluation of a Sexual Abuse Prevention Workshop for Parents of Young Children, J Child Adolesc Trauma, 2008;1:331-340.
13
Thuong NH, Ha NT, Van Tu P, Huong NTM. (). Factors associated with child sexual abuse in Vietnam: A Qualitative Study. American Journal of Educational Research. 2019;7:537-541.
14
Bolen RM, Lamb JL. Ambivalence of nonoffending guardians after child sexual abuse disclosure. J Interpers Violence. 2004;19:185-211. 
15
Godbout N, Briere J, Sabourin S, Lussier Y. Child sexual abuse and subsequent relational and personal functioning: the role of parental support. Child Abuse Negl. 2014;38:317-325.
16
Alzoubi FA, Ali RA, Flah IH, Alnatour A. Mothers’ knowledge & perception about child sexual abuse in Jordan. Child Abuse Negl. 2018;75:149-158.
17
Babatsikos G, Miles D. How parents manage the risk of child sexual abuse: a grounded theory. J Child Sex Abus. 2015;24:55-76.
18
Chen JQ, Chen DG. Awareness of child sexual abuse prevention education among parents of Grade 3 elementary school pupils in Fuxin City, China. Health Educ Res. 2005;20:540-547.
19
Rani S. Knowledge and Attitude of Teachers and Parents Regarding Child Abuse, Indian Journal of Youth and Adolescent Health.  2019;6:21-27.
20
Xie QW, Qiao DP, Wang XL. Parent-involved Prevention of Child Sexual Abuse: A Qualitative Exploration of Parents’ Perceptions and Practices in Beijing, J Child Fam Stud. 2016;25:999-1010.
21
Koçtürk N, Bilge F. Social Support of Adolescent Survivors of Child Sexual Abuse and Sexual Revictimization in Turkey. J Child Sex Abus. 2018;27:38-52. 
22
Rudolph J, Zimmer-Gembeck MJ. Parents as protectors: A qualitative study of parents’ views on child sexual abuse prevention. Child Abuse Negl. 2018;85:28-38. 
23
Thapa T, Pun KM, Raut KB, Silwal K, Chaudhary RK. Awareness on Girl Child Abuse Among Mothers of A Selected Community. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2018;56:866-870. 
24
Bakır E, Kapucu S. Reflection of Child Neglect and Abuse to Researches in Turkey: A Literature Review, Journal of Hacettepe University Faculty of Nursing. 2017;4:13-24.
25
Walsh K, Brandon L. Their Children’s First Educators: Parents’ Views about Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Education, J Child Fam Stud. 2012;21:734-746.
26
Büyüköztürk Ş, Çakmak E, Akgün ÖE, Karadeniz Ş, Demirel F. Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (8. basım). Ankara: Pegem Akademik Yayıncılık; 2011.
27
Avcıoğlu GŞ. Sosyal Bilimlerde İnternet Anketi Uygulamaları: Cevaplama Oranı, Veri Kalitesi, Örneklem Sorunları Ve Çözümleri, International Journal of Human Sciences. 2014;11:89-113.
28
Koçtürk N, Yüksel F. The Characteristics of Child Sexual Abuse in the School Environment in Turkey. J Child Sex Abus. 2018;27:852-869.
29
Bentler PM, Bonett DG. Significance Tests and Goodness of
Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures, Psychol Bull. 1980;88:588-606.
30
Kline RB. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press. 
31
Worthington RL, Whittaker TA. Scale Development Research: A Content Analysis and Recommendations for Best Practices, Couns Psychol. 2006;34:806-838. 
32
Anderson JC, Gerbing DW. The Effect of Sampling Error on Convergence, Improper Solutions, and Goodness-of-fit Indices for Maximum Likelihood Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Psychometrika. 1984;49:155-173.
33
Fraenkel JR, Wallen NE, Hyun HH. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill; 2012.  
34
Anderson J, Ellefson J, Lashley J, Miller AL, Olinger S, Russell A, The Cornerhouse Forensic Interview Protocol: RATAC, Thomas M Cooley Journal of Practical & Clinical Law. 2010;12:193-332. 
35
Adams JA. Guidelines for medical care of children evaluated for suspected sexual abuse: an update for 2008. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2008;20:435-441.
36
Olafson E, Lederman JCS. The State of the Debate About Children’s Disclosure Patterns in Child Sexual Abuse Cases, Juvenile and Family Court Journal. 2006;57:27-40.