Retrospective Analysis of Sociodemographic and Clinical Characteristics of Forensic Cases Evaluated in a Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Clinic in Konya
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Article
P: 27-32
March 2020

Retrospective Analysis of Sociodemographic and Clinical Characteristics of Forensic Cases Evaluated in a Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Clinic in Konya

Turk J Child Adolesc Ment Health 2020;27(1):27-32
1. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Meram Tıp Fakültesi, Çocuk ve Ergen Ruh Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı, Konya, Türkiye
2. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Meram Tıp Fakültesi, Adli Tıp Anabilim Dalı, Konya, Türkiye
3. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Meram Tıp Fakültesi, Ruh Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı, Konya, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 24.09.2019
Accepted Date: 30.01.2020
Publish Date: 22.03.2020
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Objectives:

The number of forensic cases in childhood and adolescence is increasing. However, the data on the characteristics of the forensic psychiatric evaluations in the field of child and adolescent psychiatry in our country are extremely limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the sociodemographic characteristics of children and adolescents who had applied to the child psychiatry outpatient clinic in Konya in the last 5 years.

Materials and Methods:

In this study, archive files and reports of 523 cases referred to Necmettin Erbakan University Meram School of Medicine Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry between January 2014 and February 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. The age, gender, family structure, educational background, place of residence, intelligence levels and reasons for referring these children, the type of crime committed by the offenders, and the types of abuse in the victims were evaluated.

Results:

Of the cases admitted to our forensic psychiatry outpatient clinic, 33.7% (n=176) were evaluated for delinquency, 39.8% (n=208) for sexual abuse and 26.6% (n=139) for other reasons. The frequency of referral was significantly higher in the sexual abuse category in girls and in the delinquency category in boys (p<0.001). School attendance was found to be higher in children who were victims of sexual abuse (p=0.025). A significant relationship was found between having a broken family and drug-related crimes (p<0.001).

Conclusion:

In our study, it was shown that most of the reasons for forensic application were sexual abuse in Konya and these children frequently attended the school. Attending the school seems to be extremely important in revealing abuse through the education and guidance support. In our study, the relationship between drug-related delinquency and family type was demonstrated. These data suggest that environmental factors may have a role in juvenile delinquency in the context of crime types. Future studies on the crime types in children and adolescents are needed.

References

1Soysal H. Çocuklarda ceza sorumluluğu. İstanbul; Adli Psikiyatri Kitabı; 2012:72-74.
2Dursun OB, Esin İS, Güleç M, Şener MT, Taş FV, Beyhun NE, Gödekli M. A possible cause of secondary traumas for children in justice system of turkey: attitudes of prosecutors and judges. Dusunen Adam The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences. 2013;26:367-375.
3Schetky DH. Child and Adolescent Forensic Psychiatry. In: Sadock BJ, Sadock VA eds. Kaplan &Sadock’s Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry., 8th ed. New York; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.
4Sercan M. Adli Psikiyatri Uygulama Klavuzu. Türkiye Psikiyatri Derneği Yayınları. Ankara; Tuna Matbaacılık; 2007:16-23.
5Biçer Ü, Hancı H. Adli Psikiyatri (Birinci Basamak İçin Adli Tıp Elkitabı) TTB-ATUD; 1999:147-156.
6Yokuş Sevük H. Ceza sorumluluğu ve çocuk yargılama sistemi. Ankara Barosu Hukuk Kurultay Kitapçığı; Ankara; 2000:238-245
7Erdoğan A, Balcıoğlu İ. Çocuk ve Ergenlerde Adli Psikiyatri. Turkiye Klinikleri J Psychiatry. 2003;4:101-107.
8Oto R. Suç, Çocuk ve İsnad Yeteneği. Kamu Hukuku Arşivi; Ekim; 1998:79-82.
9T.C Adalet Bakanlığı. Ceza Sorumluluğunun Değerlendirilmesi Rehberi; 2010.
10Gördeles Beşer N, Baysan Arabacı L, Uzunoğlu G. Türkiye’de bir bölge psikiyatri hastanesinde tedavi olan suça itilmiş çocuk profilleri. Anadolu Psikiyatri Derg. 2016;17:317-324
11Şahin F. Fiziksel İstismar. Çocuk ve Ergen Psikiyatrisi Temel Kitabı. İçinde: Çetin FÇ, Coşkun A, İşeri E, ve ark, editörler. Ankara; Çocuk ve Gençlik Ruh Sağlığı Derneği; 2008:462-469.
12Hebert M, Parent N, Daignault I, Tourigny M. A typological analysis of behavioural profiles of sexually abused children. Child Maltreat. 2006;11:203-216
13İşeri E. Cinsel istismar. Çocuk ve Ergen Ruh Sağlığı Temel Kitabı. Ankara; Hekimler Yayın Birliği; 2008:470-477.
14Tahiroğlu-Yolga A, Avcı A. Cinsel istismar. Çocuk ve Ergen Ruh Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları. İçinde: Aysev-Soykan A, Taner Işık Y, editörleri. İstanbul; Asimetrik Paralel; 2007:727-736.
15Gökten ES. 2009-2011 yılları arasında bir devlet hastanesinde çocuk psikiyatrisi polikliniğine yönlendirilen adli olgular. Turk J Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2011;18:105-116.
16Ayaz M, Ayaz AB, Soylu N. Çocuk ve ergen adli olgularda ruhsal değerlendirme. Klin Psikiyatr Derg. 2012;15:33-40.
17Şener MT, Dursun OB, Aydın EF, Arslan S, Güleç M. Adli psikiyatri değerlendirme istemlerinde adli mercilerin branş tercihleri: Bir üniversite hastanesi deneyimi. Düşünen Adam The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences. 2014;27:155-159
18Öztop DB, Özcan ÖÖ. Cinsel istismar vakalarının sosyodemografik ve klinik özelliklerinin değerlendirilmesi. New Symposium. 2010;48:270-276.
19Pereda N, Guilera G, Forns M, Gómez-Benito J. The prevalence of child sexual abuse in community and student samples: A meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2009;29:328-338.
20Glaser D. Child sexual abuse. Rutter’s Child and Adolescent Psychiatry içinde, 5th ed. In:Rutter M, ed. USA; Blackwell Publishing Company; 2002:340-358.
21Fis NP, Arman A, Kalaca S, Berkem M. Psychiatric evaluation of sexual abuse cases: a clinical representative sample from Turkey. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2010;32:1285-1290.
22Polusny MA, Follette VM. Long-term correlates of child sexual abuse: theory and review of the empirical literature. Appl Prev Psychol. 1995;4:143-166.
23Özen NE, Șener Ș. Çocuk ve ergende cinsel istismar. Ege Psikiyatri Sürekli Yayınları; 1997;2:473-491.
24Keskin G, Çam O. Çocuk cinsel istismarına psikodinamik hemșirelik yaklașımı. Yeni Symposium; 2005;43:118-125.
25Finkelhor D, Browne A. The traumatic impact of child sexual abuse: a conceptualization. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1985;55:530-541.
26Aktepe E. Çocukluk çağı cinsel istismarı. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar; 2009:95-119.
27Zhang Y, Ming QS, Yi JY, Wang X, Chai QL, Yao SQ. Gene-Gene-Environment Interactions of Serotonin Transporter, Monoamine Oxidase A and Childhood Maltreatment Predict Aggressive Behavior in Chinese Adolescents. Front Behav Neurosci. 2017;11:17.
28Spencer N, Devereux E, Wallace A, Sundrum R, Shenoy M, Bacchus C, Logan S. Disabling conditions and registration for child abuse and neglect: a population-based study. Pediatrics. 2005;116:609-613.
29Wong TML, Slotboom AM, Bijleveld CJH. Risk factors for delinquency in adolescent and young adult females: A European review. Eur J Criminol. 2010;7:266-284.
30Göç L. Çocuk Suçluluğu ve Polisin Yaklaşımı, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 2006, http://www.kutuphane.ksu.edu.tr/e-tez/sbe/T00557/Lutfu_goc.pdf (Erişim Tarihi 27.12.2010)
31Şen S, Karbeyaz K, Toygar M, Akkaya H. Eskişehir’de suça itilen çocukların sosyodemografik değerlendirilmesi. Adli Tıp Dergisi. 2012;26:146-155.
32Unıted Natıons Chıldren’s Fund (UNICEF). Early Marriage; Child Spouses; 2001.
33Uçan Süpürge. Küçük Yaşta Evlilik Büyük Geliyor: Çocuk Gelinler, Ankara: Uçan Süpürge Yayınları; 2011
34Sokullu FA. Çocuk suçluluğu kriminolojisinde aile faktörü. Adliye ve Çocuk Suçluluğu Sempozyumu; İstanbul; 1992.
Article is only available in PDF format. Show PDF
2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House