EN | TR
E-ISSN: 2687-3532
The Relationship Between Psychological Violence Against Women and Parental Attitudes: The Case of Gümüşhane Province
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Article
VOLUME: 27 ISSUE: 1
P: 40-48
March 2020

The Relationship Between Psychological Violence Against Women and Parental Attitudes: The Case of Gümüşhane Province

Turk J Child Adolesc Ment Health 2020;27(1):40-48
DOI: 10.4274/tjcamh.galenos.2020.00719
Ayşin Çetinkaya Büyükbodur 1
Ahmet Burhan Çakıcı 2
1. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Sosyal Hizmet Anabilim Dalı, Gümüşhane, Türkiye
2. Karamanoğlu Mehmet Bey Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Yönetim ve Organizasyon Anabilim Dalı, Karaman, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 08.01.2020
Accepted Date: 26.02.2020
Publish Date: 22.03.2020
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Objectives:

In this study, it was aimed to investigate the relationship between psychological violence against women and parental attitudes.

Materials and Methods:

The research is a cross-sectional study in relational screening model type among general screening models. The study group of the research consists of 159 women between the ages of 22-45 who are volunteers to participate in the study and living in the central district of Gümüşhane province with their spouse/partners and who have children between the ages of 2-6 years. The characteristics of the participants were determined by the Socio-demographic information form. Parental attitudes were measured with the Parental Attitude scale (PAS), the psychological violence perceived by their spouse/partners with the short form of psychological torment inventory (PMWI). SPSS 21.0 package program was used in the analysis of the data. Spearman correlation analysis was used to determine the relationship between PAS and PMWI, and difference tests were used to determine whether the sub-dimensions of the scales differed according to socio-demographic characteristics.

Results:

PMWI sub-dimension, emotional verbal violence, and permissive attitude (r=-0.360 p<0.01), overprotective attitude (r=-0.467 p<0.01) and democratic attitude (r=-0.580 p<0.01) negative, moderate, authoritarian parent attitude (r=0.753 p<0.01) positive correlation was found. Of the PMWI sub-dimensions, responsibility had negatively moderate relationship with authoritative attitude (r=-0.527 p<0.01) and democratic attitude (r=-0.609 p<0.01), and a positive moderately significant relationship with authoritarian parental attitude (r=0.565 p<0.01) was detected. PMWI sub-dimension/blame threat had a moderate negative relationship with protective attitude (r=-0.594 p<0.01) and democratic attitude (r=-0.408 p<0.01), and a positive low level significant relationship with authoritarian parental attitude (r=0.294 p<0.01).

Conclusion:

A statistically significant relationship was found between psychological violence perceived by women and parental attitudes. PMWI and PAS subscales were found to differ significantly according to the level of education and number of children (p<0.05).

References

1Kulkarni SJ, Bell H, Rhodes DM. Back to Basics: Essential Qualities of Services for Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence, Violence Against Women. 2012;18:85-101.
2WHO. Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. Geneva, Switzerland; Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization; 2013; (ISBN:978-92-4-156462-5).
3Dutton M, Kaltman S, Goodman L, Weinfurt K, Vankos N. Patterns of Intimate partner violence: Correlates and outcomes, Violence and Victims. 2005;20:483-497.
4Golding JM. Intimate Partner Violence as a Risk Factor for Mental Disorders: A Meta-Analysis, Journal of Family Violence. 1999;14:99-132.
5Hamberger LK, Hastings JE. Personality correlates of men who abuse their partners: A cross-validation study, Journal of Family Violence. 1986;323-341.
6Graham-Bermann SA, Miller LE. Intervention to Reduce Traumatic Stress Following Intimate Partner Violence: An Efficacy Trial of the Moms’ Empowerment Program (MEP), Psychodynamic Psychiatry. 2013;41:329-349.
7Kumar A, Nizamie HS, Srivastava NK. Violence against women and mental health, Mental Health Prevention. 2013;1:4-10.
8Babu BV, Kar SK. Domestic violence against women in eastern India: a population-based study on prevalence and related issues, BMC Public Health. 2009;9:1-25.
9Bonomi AE, Thompson RS, Anderson M, Reid RJ, Carrell D, Dimer JA, Rivara FP. Intimate Partner Violence and Women’s Physical, Mental, and Social Functioning, American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2006;30:458-466.
10WHO. Department of gender, women and health, family and community health. Adressing violence against women and achieving the milennium goals. Geneva, Switzerland,2005;http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/43361/1/WHOpdf.
11Ersoy NC, Hünler OS, Namer Y. Kadına Psikolojik Eziyet Envanteri Kısa Formu Türkçe Uyarlaması, Klinik Psikiyatri. 2017;20:276-286.
12O’Leary KD, Maiuro RD. Psychological Abuse in Violent Domestic Relations, In: O’Leary KD, Maiuro RD, eds. New York: Springer Publishing Campany; 2001:1-21.
13Kerig, PK, Swanson, JA. (2010). Ties that bind: Triangulation, boundary dissolution, and the effects of inter‐parental conflict on child development, in MS. Schulz, MK. Pruett, PK Kerig, RD. Parke, eds. Strengthening Couple Relationships for Optimal Child Development. Washington DC: American Psychological Association; 2010:55-76.
14Gilbert AL, Bauer NS, Carroll AE, Downs SM. Child Exposure to Parental Violence and Psychological Distress Associated With Delayed Milestones, Pediatrics. 2013;132:1577-1583.
15Blumenthal DR, Neeman J, Murphy CM. Lifetime exposure to interparental physical and verbal aggression and symptom expression in college students. Violence and Victims, 1998;13(2):175-196.
16Sugarman DB, Hotaling GT. Dating violence: Prevalence, context, and riskmarkers, In: Pirog-Good MAES, Jan E, eds. Violence in dating relationships: Emerging social issues. New York, NY: Praeger Publishers; 1989:1-32.
17Conger RD, Conger KJ, Elder GH Jr, Lorenz FO, Simons RL, Whitbeck LB. Family economic stress and adjustment of early adolescent girls, Developmental Psychology. 1993;29:206-219.
18Erel O, Burman B. Interrelatedness of marital relations and parentchild relations: A meta-analytic review, Psychological Bulletin. 1995;118:108-132.
19Jenkins JM, Smith MA. Marital disharmony and children’s behaviour problems: Aspects of a poor marriage that affect children adversely, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 1991;32:793-810.
20Conger RD, Ge X, Elder GH, Jr Lorenz FO, Simons RL. Economic stress, coercive family process, and developmental problems of adolescents, Child Development. 1994;65:541-561.
21Demir EK, Şendil G. Ebeveyn Tutum Ölçeği (ETÖ), Türk Psikoloji Yazıları. 2008;11:15-25.
22Tolman R. Psychological abuse of women, in Assessment of Family Violence: A Clinical and Legal Sourcebook. Ammerman R, Hersen M, eds. New York: John Wiley; 1992;291-310.
23Bozgöz F, Erkan R. Kadına Yönelik Şiddetin Sosyo-ekonomik, Dinsel ve Kültürel Boyutları: Diyarbakır Örneği, Ekev Akademi Dergisi. 2004;8:219-242.
24Vasconcelos Marilena Silva, Holanda Viviane Rolim, Albuquerque Thaíse Torres. Profile of the aggressor and factors associated with violence, Cogitare Enferm. 2016;21:01-10.
25Garciá-Moreno C. Violence against women: Consolidating a public health agenda. In G. Sen, A. George, P. Ostlin, eds. Engendering International Health: The Challenge of Equity. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press; 2002:111-141.
26Sanz-Barbero B, Barón N, Vives-Cases C. Prevalence, associated factors and health impact of intimate partner violence against women in different life stages, PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0221049.
27Yanık A, Hanbaba Z, Soygür S, Ayaltı B, Doğan M. Kadına yönelik şiddet davranışlarının değerlendirilmesi: Türkiye’den kanıt, Electronic Journal of Vocational Colleges. 2014:104-111.
28Kamat U, Ferreira A, Motghare D, Kamat N, Pinto NR. A cross-sectional study of physical spousal violence against women in Goa, Journal Healthline. 2010;1:34-40.
29Yazar GN. Aile İçi Kadına Yönelik Şiddeti Etkileyen Faktörlerin Lojistik Regresyon ile Analizi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ekonometri Anabilim Dalı, İstatistik Bilim Dalı, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Bursa,2018.
30Tocu R. Study on the parental beliefs and attitudes towards child rearing and education, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014;137:153-157.
31Aydoğdu F, Dilekmen M. Ebeveyn Tutumlarının Çeşitli Değişkenler Açısından Değerlendirilmesi, Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2016;11:569-585.
32Yaprak B. İlköğretim Öğrencilerinin Algıladıkları Anne-Baba Tutumunun Diskriminant Analiziyle Belirlenmesi ve Benlik Saygısı ile Olan İlişkisinin Değerlendirilmesi Üzerine Bir Uygulama. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Eskişehir, 2007.
33Güneysu S, Bilir Ş. Üniversite Gençlerinin Kendilerini Kabul Düzeyine Algılanan Anne Baba Tutumlarının Etkisi. Aile Yazıları, Ankara: T.C. Başbakanlık Aile Araştırma Kurumu Yayınları,1991.
Article is only available in PDF format. Show PDF
2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House